Emma Rees- Objects of Art: Laura
Opening Sequence Video
Objects of Art: Laura
“I shall never forget the weekend Laura died.” This narrated line over a black scene immediately sets up a chilling atmosphere when we have yet to see anything. Laura (1944) begins with a narration by columnist, Waldo Lydecker, who utters a line most famous that sets up the film’s genre and tone from the get go; “I shall never forget the weekend Laura died.” And despite not being present for most of the film and usually talked about in flashbacks or diary writings, Laura maintains a large influence over the male characters in the film. While this daunting line continues to stay with the audience throughout the film, it is later revealed that the character, Laura, is in fact, not dead at all. Many people overlook this part of the film because of the preceding idea that intro scenes provide nothing more than background information and introductions. But that is exactly why this scene needs a close analysis because it demonstrates Lydecker’s personality, how he does not love Laura, but simply wants her because of his objectification, and the differing contrast between him and McPherson that foreshadows a protagonist and antagonist storyline.
A pan shot depicting magnificent works of art from a statue to a seemingly harmless clock with a somewhat cheery soundtrack in the background moves the audience from the continuing narration of describing the feeling of sorrow with a happy go-lucky vibe. Contrasting between Lydecker’s voiceover and brightly lit décor, demonstrates his materialistic and fanciful life that rings true of nostalgic undertones. After the pan from left to right, we have a medium shot on McPherson who seems to be fascinated by this kind of environment. His hard-boiled detective presence contrasts him from this frivolous and lavish home of a person fond of beauty. Lydecker hates surprises and makes him wait in frustration at the intrusion, this implicates the division between the two and foreshadows how their relationship will turn out-a villain vs the protagonist. Next, we have in inversion of camera shots-the camera pans continuously from right to left when the clock chimes and symbolizes McPherson taking on an active role with his movement. He looks dismissively at a clock that makes a bigger appearance later in the film and makes his way into the bathroom when Waldo sharply demands he be careful with is possessions
As a newspaper columnist, it makes sense for him to talk in fluffy words and meet him typing away, naked in a bathtub upon the first time we are introduced to Lydecker in person. Well, that last part is slightly confusing because he blatantly exposes his entire body to the detective investigating the murder, McPherson. This implicates homosexuality from Lydecker which makes his obsession all the more interesting. If he does not love her, sexually or platonically, then what kind of love is it? Or can we even call it love? The kind that’s associated with obsession, perfection, and the idealized image he views her as would not necessarily be called love, but objectification. Perhaps he loves the idea of her, the creation he’s made. Later in the film, we see him mold Laura into the woman he believes to be the best with the right hairstyle and fashion. This goes in hand with the pan of artwork he has collected because he wants the best, and Laura is the best.
When McPherson walks into the bathroom where Lydecker sits in a bathtub, he has his typewriter between the two of them. Unlike other antagonists in noir films who use guns or physical power, Lydecker uses his words and columns as a “weapon of distinction” to tear people’s reputations down and protect what he thinks is rightfully his. Throughout the entire scene, his narration is full of fanciful words that match the interior design of his home, attention-grabbers are present everywhere because he wants attention. While Lydecker’s words begin with the sorrowful death of Laura, he continues to describe how he feels instead of the loss of a friend. He is also the one to have the last word at the end of the film with his declaration of love while death is at the door. Even then, after Lydecker’s declaration, he can’t help but talk about himself and refocus the attention back on himself.
Noir is evident throughout the entire film of Laura and has a huge presence in the beginning scene. We’re introduced to the plot of a murdered woman and the hard-boiled detective. Bringing along Lydecker adds the element of an expensive life-style who “never bothers with details” and prefers his interpretation of the world to reality. Compared to McPherson who is just “one of those detectives” and lives in the world of crime, it’s natural to see Lydecker as a possible villain right from the get go. Waldo Lydecker may not be able to be the perfect image of a noir villain living in wealth but it’s clear that his flounce of words dripping with venom are not to be overlooked.
Hi Emma,
ReplyDeleteFirst of all, I think that the subject matter of this paper is very interesting. The fine line between love and obsession in Noir films is definitely crossed in this film by Waldo and I think exploring why that may be was a great choice. I would have liked to see you develop the idea of Waldo as a homosexual in more ways than just stating the bathtub scene. What other evidence is there? Was it the fact that he hadn't had any women other than Laura? Was it his mannerisms toward the other men of this movie? Second, I think that your analysis of a Waldo as a journalist could have run deeper. You set up you third paragraph amazingly by talking about how Waldo uses his column but I would have liked to see more analysis of the columns use and how Waldo's spoken words helped him through the film. His speaking mannerisms are very distinct and frivolous compared to those of McPherson. Lastly, you brought up the idea of Waldo being different than McPherson in many ways and that subject was barley mentioned other than to mention their interactions. I think that you could have mentioned their interactions with Laura as individuals and compared them. Overall, I think that your topic was immensely interesting and made me consider Waldo in a new way and that your paper was very well transitioned.
Hey Emma,
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed reading your analysis on Lydecker, and bringing to light that Lydecker is perhaps a homosexual was an interesting choice and something I had not even thought of. Like Kaitlyn said, I wish you would have gone into deeper analysis and how that contributed to the plot of the movie. Were there other scenes that demonstrated this? When talking about the different tools used in making this move (the medium shot, the pan shot), I think it would have been useful to go into more depth and how it contributed to the scene. Instead of just listing them in order, you could maybe add more of how these shots effected the viewer when watching the movie. What was the use of the medium shot? Why couldn't they have used a close up or an over the shoulder shot? Was a pan shot necessary, or would it have been okay to just cut directly to McPherson? Your analysis of how Lydecker is constantly searching for attention was wonderful. I agree that he felt like everything was about him, but I have to say with the lack of evidence proving that Lydecker was gay, I have a difficult time agreeing. Over all, your essay did a great job cutting straight to the chase, and it was interesting to read.
Emma,
ReplyDeleteYour motive for this essay was GREAT. I was drawn into this paper because you provided me a reason to read it and that was awesome, and especially distinguishing between Lydecker not loving Laura but rather objectifying her was powerful too. Your use of questions throughout was powerful too because you raised interesting points, such as if Lydecker's affection was love or not, as well as your point that Lydecker does not represent a typical noir villain because he uses words, not guns and physical violence. Overall, I found your paper very compelling. One thing I would change is to tie most of these themes more in with the actual camera work and the mechanics of how the scenes were shot, especially in your conclusion where you say noir is present in Laura, which I don't think is the main point of your essay or even a relevant claim to make, but rather center on the objectification theme and mention how that is evident in the scene itself. Pictures of some of these scenes would be cool too!
-Drew