The Melting Pot That is Noir
Throughout the semester thus far
the underlying question that we have been striving to answer is ‘what is
noir?’. Is noir a genre, a critical category, or just a mood created by visual
style? One thing that is for certain is that noir is a French term that means
“black night” (Ebert). Although it is difficult to pinpoint exactly what noir
is, there are certain essential attributes that all noir novels and films
contain. In class, we brainstormed some generic qualities of noir, and in the
classical era I would say black and white photography is a must; it helps to
set up another critical element, which is a mood of impending doom. The low-key
lighting, various shadows, and harsh angles portray this in a way that color
would lack to achieve. Violence, of all sorts, usually resulting in at least
one murder, are also key indicators that a film or novel is noir. There is
always a murder that is either trying to be solved from the get-go, or occurs
at the end of the storyline, and in that case, it is usually the death of the
protagonist, who is a witty, tough guy type. The underlying themes typically
consist of betrayal, corruption, and critique of the American Dream, which in
short is the idea that all citizens have an equal opportunity to achieve
success. One last thing that cannot be forgotten is the presence of and
fixation on cigarettes. Can a film or novel even be classified as noir without
the existence of cigarettes? In my opinion, no.
In the novels read up until this
point, starting with Dashiell Hammett’s The
Maltese Falcon, we can see some of these essential qualities of noir. The
plotline of this novel centers around the most basic noir plotline, which is a
detective trying to solve a crime, with the presence of a femme fatale; Naremore
sums up the detective plotline perfectly with the quote that “she is fatal to
even herself” (Naremore 20). Hammett’s protagonist Samuel Spade, a hard-edged,
witty, macho man is approached by Brigid O’Shaughnessy, a seductive,
manipulative femme fatale. Throughout the novel he attempts to help her find
the prized object of the Maltese Falcon, all the while she is either feeding
him false information, withholding information, or towards the end, entrapping
him. This novel end in Samuel Spade leaving the situation scotch free and the
rest of the charcters, including Brigid, being handed over to the police. Differing
from the first novel, James M. Cain’s The
Postman Always Rings Twice tells the story of traveler named Frank Chambers
who stops at roadside sandwich joint and finds himself staying there to work
for the Greek owner, and simultaneously falls for his unhappy wife, Cora. They
plotted to murder the Greek twice, succeeding the second time. This resulted in
trust issues within their relationship that were ultimately resolved by the end
of the novel when they went to the beach after they were wed. The novel ends with
Cora being killed in a car crash and Frank being left to hang for it, leaving
the looming question of whether he intentionally did or not. Resembling the first
novel, Raymond Chandler’s The Big Sleep
has a confusing plot centering around private detective Philip Marlowe, who is
trying to solve a blackmailing problem for General Sternwood involving his
daughter Carmen. Marlowe exposes the blackmailers and further pursues the
troubling disappearance of Carmen’s sister Vivian’s husband Rusty. After some
snooping, fights, and deaths, Marlowe pays a visit to the General’s home, where
he runs into Carmen who fires five shots at him. Marlowe remained unscathed
because the gun was not loaded, and it was discovered that Carmen killed Rusty
because he denied her sexual advances as did Marlowe.
All
of these novels are different in their plotlines, but they all possess key characteristics
that classify them as noir. A common character in noir novels and films is the
hard-boiled detective who is masochistic, somewhat curious, witty, calm, cool,
and collected (Naremore 20). Although not all of these novels implement a
detective figure, all of the main characters embody this description. Spade is
described as looking “pleasantly like a blond Satan”, which tells the reader
that he will be a hard-edged but sly character (Hammett 1). Frank is also a
blunt, callous character who says what he thinks and does what he wants when he
wants. An example of his bluntness is at the beginning of the novel when he
asks Cora about why she is married to the Greek despite the fact that he knows
it’s a sensitive subject for her (Cain 7). Philip Marlowe is a guy who knows
how to play the game and play it well, and that can be conveyed through this
quote, “I was neat, clean, shaved and sober, and I didn’t care who knew it. I
was everything the well-dressed private detective ought to be (Chandler 3).”
All of these characters are different but have similar core personality traits.
Additionally,
these novels are linked by the essential attributes of noir. For starters, all
of these novels include violence and death. In The Maltese Falcon the novel begins with the death of Spade’s
partner Archer, and the investigation leads to another death. The violence
ensues due to the fact that every time Spade and one of his employers’ henchman
Wilmer always throw punches when they cross paths. In The Postman Always Rings Twice, the murder of the Greek is violent
during both attempts. In the first attempt, The Greek is hit in the head with a
homemade blackjack, and during the second attempt he is hit in the head with a
bottle. And then then in the end Cora dies a tragic death in a car accident. The Big Sleep also employs violence
during Marlowe’s fight with Canino, and his almost assassination by Carmen.
These
novels also share the common themes of betrayal and corruption. Spade is
betrayed various time by Brigid, including when she joins the other perpetrators
to set him up to take the blame for the murders at the end of the novel, but he
also does some betraying; at the end he sells Brigid out, not allowing himself to
“play the sap” for her because of his feelings. Hand in hand with betrayal is
the theme of corruption, which comes into play when it is discovered that
Brigid is the reason for the death of Archer and Thursby, her previous
protector. Frank and Cora’s relationship is built off of corruption and
betrayal, since after the murder of her husband when they go through the court
system and Frank is tricked into admitting that Cora planned the murder. After
that their relationship is rocky because neither of them trust the other, and
they continuously threaten to go to the authorities with proof that it is the
fault of the other. In The Big Sleep corruption
occurs because of the blackmail scandal.
In
addition to novels, cinema is a staple of noir. Two of the films watched, The Maltese Falcon and The Big Sleep, we also read the novels
for, and although there are some variations in the story it is the same for the
most part. One of the other films we watched, Out of the Past, has a similar plotline in which Jeff Bailey,
another classic tough guy detective, was hired by a man to find his previous
girlfriend who stole money from him. Jeff succeeded in finding the girl,
Kathie, and they fell in love and ran away together. After realizing that
Kathie was a manipulative liar he disassociated himself with her, until the day
when the man who originally hired him called him up to meet with him. Kathie
implemented the themes of corruption and betrayal in this film when she
betrayed Jeff by returning back to her original lover to help him frame Jeff
for a murder. She was corrupt in the way that she manipulated her lover’s
henchmen to do her dirty work, mostly being attempts on Jeff’s life. Violence
ensues in this film as in the others in many ways. Kathie is responsible for
many deaths; she murders Jeff and his previous partner, and is responsible for
the death of her husband’s henchman since she sent him out to kill Jeff, which
is when he fell off of a cliff and died.
Another
film that we watched was Double Indemnity,
which involves the attempt at the prefect crime in which Walter Neff, a carefree tough guy, and Phyllis conspire to murder
her husband, get the insurance money, and run away together. To no surprise it
doesn’t work out that way. In the end, Phyllis tries to shoot Neff and fails,
which results in him shooting her and then confessing his actions to the
police. Corruption comes in the form of crime and greed, which spurns Phyllis’
motives for attempting Neff’s murder. By doing this she also betrays him, while
he is simultaneously betraying the insurance company for which he works by
trying to get away with this crime in the first place.
All
of these novels and films also critique the conventional American Dream. In all
of these films and novels the goal is to get rich quick, not to achieve success
through hard work, which is the core of the American Dream. The fact that there
are so many movies and novels that employ this way of thinking imply that
Americans have always had doubts about the actual success of the American Dream
and view it in a pessimistic manner (Cawelti).
By
comparing these novels and films I am showcasing the fact that they all have
key themes in common, or resemblances. In Wittgenstein’s definition of genre,
he mentions the concept of family resemblance, the idea that there are no
essential defining features of genres, but just a set of resemblances. In other
words, not all of the films and novels in the genre of noir need to implement a
specific set of features to include them in the genre; noir can still be a
genre even if all of the works don’t share specific features but just share
resemblances (Abrams).
Barton Palmer argues that film noir is a
category created by the critics. He claims that when looking at any one of
these works on its own it cannot be coined as noir, but I disagree (Irwin 208).
Although there is not a set of characteristics that wholly define noir, there
are many commonalities between noir works that tie them together. Also, in
regard to Wittgenstein’s definition of genre, there doesn’t have to be a set of
defining attributes that constitutes noir because of his idea of family
resemblance. With this in mind, we can note that the novels and films we have
so far engaged with are tied together with a few common aspects. Because of
their common threads, we can argue that noir is a genre as defined by
Wittgenstein.
Works Cited
Ebert, Roger. "A Guide to Film Noir Genre." (1995): n.
pag. Web.
Irwin, James. "Hard-Boiled Fiction and Film Noir." Unless
the Threat of Death Is Behind Them. N.p.: Johns Hopkins UP, 2008. N. pag.
Print.
Naremore, James. More
Than Night. University of California Press, 2008.
Abrams, M.H. A
Glossary of Literary Terms. Woodsworth Press, 2012.
Cawelti, John G. “The Gunfighter and the Hard-Boiled Dick:
Some Ruminations on American Fantasies of Heroism.” Mystery, Violence, and Popular Culture. University of Wisconsin
Press, 2004.
Hi Mallory,
ReplyDeleteI liked your essay a lot, since you specifically pinpointed commonalities between the works we've read and viewed up to this point in the semester. I enjoyed that you gave us enough information on each work that we could be refreshed, and your citations helped (plus, in laying down a little bit of exposition whenever you mention an individual work you are writing for an audience that may not know much about these works). I also liked how you walked us through the novels first, and then tied in the movies later. I know I kind of jumbled them all up, but you gave a lot of thought to the importance of splitting these sections up into two parts. I would suggest maybe adding subheadings at these critical points so the reader has a pause and a visual cue that your thoughts are transitioning. I was also thrown off a bit with your ending sentence where you conclude that film noir is a genre--I would have liked to have had insight into your position on that earlier instead of having it said at the end.
Mal,
ReplyDeleteYou had a very strong essay. You really gave lots of evidence and you definitely showed how similar those hardboiled novels and noir films are. However, I agree with Drew in that your stance should have been made earlier, perhaps before you began describing each of the books and films. I was a bit confused about why you were striving so hard to prove that they were similar until you eventually argued that they were a genre because of their similarity. Also, you tended to focus on only the films that supported your point, not the ones that were a bit more different from the rest. If someone wanted to argue that noir weren't a genre, they would likely point immediately to The Killing or Sunset Boulevard, as their plots are quite a bit different from The Maltese Falcon or the Big Sleep. A strong naysayers argument would show that you understand what point they are making, but still stand your ground because of ____ & ____. However, all in all, it was very easy to read and understand and by the end, I definitely understood what stance you had taken. Good work.