Typical Neo-Noir--Paul Bodera
Typical Neo-Noir
When did
film noir evolve into neo-noir? The term neo-noir can be used to describe any
film or novel that came after the noir time period and embodies characteristics
similar to its predecessor, such as the femme fatale, a confused hero, and a
negative, pessimistic view of the world. However, neo-noir is also used to
present and describe more modern, contemporary noir films and novels with added
themes of paranoia and other mental problems, revenge, and ruined
relationships. That is why if our semester was a week longer, the addition of
the film The Last Seduction, would fit perfectly with the neo-noir
theme.
So where
do we start seeing neo-noir films? Chinatown (1974), is a good place to
start, as such movie marked the start of the neo-noir era. Chinatown
contains noir elements, from the classic noir detective/hero, private detective
Jake Gittes, to the gloomy, pessimistic view of its setting, the city of Los
Angeles. It was the first film we watched in class that introduced us to the
neo-noir genre.
Also
in the neo-noir genre, we have the novel Devil in a Blue Dress, with
femme-fatale, Daphne Monet. Daphne is a black woman who appears and acts as if
she’s white. Throughout the novel, Daphne changes and manipulates her
appearance and the way people view her, which is why she’s compared to a
chameleon. “Daphne was like the chameleon lizard. She changed for her man”
(Mosley, 230). Throughout the novel, we see her facial expressions, eye color,
and even hair color change. Easy would see the look in her face change.
Sometimes she would have a loving, sweet look and other times her face would
have a harsh, cold look. It is often mentioned that “Her eyes flashed
green...Her eyes turned blue,” and “Her nose, her cheeks, her skin color- they
were white. Daphne was a white woman” (Mosley, 248). This makes Daphne a femme
fatale because she is given the ability to manipulate the way others perceive
her. Furthermore, Daphne is also a femme fatale in the sense that not only does
she play mind games with Easy and takes advantage of his love for her, but she
also takes advantage of Todd Carter and steals $30,000 from him. The
characteristic of being manipulative is a key element to the femme fatale
because it shifts the typical power dynamic between men and women, where
the man is usually seen as the most powerful of the two, to the noir power
dynamic, where the femme fatale has a one-up over the male characters.
We
are introduced to a similar femme fatale character, Bridget Gregory, in the
film The Last Seduction. In The Last Seduction, telemarketing
manager Bridget Gregory convinces her husband Clay to sell cocaine, steals the
money he makes from selling the drugs, and flees New York in order to escape
her unhappy marriage. She stops in the small town of Beston on her way to
Chicago, where she is forced to stay for some time so her husband doesn’t track
her down. In Beston, she meets Mike Swale, Bridget’s “designated fuck”, whom
she uses for sexual pleasure during her stay in the town. She gets a job at his
his insurance company and makes a plan to sell murder to cheated wives. She
tries to get Mike involved in it, saying that if he really loves her he will
work with her and help her. At first, Mike opposes, but he later complies and
Bridget even tricks him into helping her kill her husband. Bridget’s wicked
character is able to commit murder, deceit, and theft without second thought,
which makes her a very excellent femme fatale. She is cold and heartless and is
even perceived as crazy by Mike, who feared her thirst and drive for murder.
“I am a total fucking bitch,” she says throughout the movie. At the end
of the movie, she ends up killing her husband and accusing Mike of rape. Just like
Daphne in Devil in a Blue Dress is seen as having a lot of power over
Easy and the other men, we see how Bridget comes out as the clear “winner” of
the movie, having been able to control Mike and manipulate both him and the
crime scene.
Bridget’s
motivation for being a “total fucking bitch,” is due to her unhappy marriage.
However, Bridget and Clay from the film The Last Seduction aren’t the
only ones with a bad relationship. Amy and Nick from Gone Girl are also
miserable in their marriage. The main reason for their toxic relationship is
that Amy has been pretending to be “cool girl” Amy, someone she is not. From
the moment she meets Nick, Amy faked being the woman in every man’s dreams. To
Amy, being a cool girl means being “a hot, brilliant, funny woman who adores
football, poker and dirty jokes, who plays videogames and chugs beer” (Flynn,
312). Amy acts this way to win Nick over. However, eventually, Amy starts
getting tired of pretending. “So it had to stop. Committing to Nick, feeling
safe with Nick, being happy with Nick, made me realize that there was a Real
Amy in there, and she was so much better, more interesting and complicated and
challenging, than Cool Amy.. Can you imagine, finally showing your true self to
your spouse, your soul mate, and having him not like you?” (Flynn, 316).
According to Amy, Nick "didn't love me, me. Nick loved a girl who doesn't
exist" (Flynn, 311). When Amy couldn’t keep up with the role of the “Cool
Girl” and got sick of it, their marriage started to collapse. As a result, a
toxic relationship began to form between the two. Things only get worse when
Amy finds out that Nick is having an affair, and decides to teach Nick a lesson
by faking her disappearance and possible death as a form of revenge. Toxic relationships
seem to be a recurring theme in film neo-noir because it creates more problems
and complicates the interactions between the femme fatale and the main male
character. Furthermore, it escalates and resonates the mood of impending doom
that we see in classic film noirs, which came before neo-noir.
Our
neo-noir theme of revenge continues with the film Memento. In the movie,
Leonard suffers from anterograde amnesia, the inability to form new memories,
as well as short-term memory loss. His condition is the result of an accident
he had, where someone attacked him when he tried to save his wife from getting
raped and killed. In order to remember things and live his life to his best as
well as carry out his plan of killing the man who killed and raped his wife,
Leonard uses Polaroid pictures and tattoos to keep track of and store
information he cannot remember. Leonard knows a guy “John G” killed and rape
his wife, as it says so on his tattoo, and throughout the entire movie, Lenny
is determined to find the guy and kill him. All he does with his life is
basically find clues to try to find John G. Lenny holds a lot of anger and
hatred for the guy who killed his wife, and when Teddy asks him “You really
want to get this guy, don't you?” Lenny bitterly responds, “He killed my wife.
He took away my fuckking memory. He destroyed my ability to live.” This shows
that Lenny is so hurt and depressed over his loss (his wife’s death), that he
will go to any extreme to avenge her death and make her killer pay for what he
did. At the end of the movie, Teddy tells Lenny that he is an undercover cop
and he helped him kill the man who killed his wife. Teddy thought Leonard would
remember killing the real John G, but Leonard is unable to remember the event.
Ever since, Teddy has made up other John G's for Leonard to kill. Teddy tells
us that Sammy Jankis was a fraud, and that Leonard’s wife is the one who was
diabetic. Lenny is in denial and doesn’t want to believe Teddy. “I'm not a
killer. I'm just someone who wanted to make things right. Can't I just let
myself forget what you've told me? Can't I just let myself forget what you've
made me do. You think I just want another puzzle to solve? Another John G. to
look for? You're John G. So you can be my John G... Will I lie to myself to be
happy? In your case Teddy... yes I will.” This leads to Lenny writing down
Teddy’s license plate number as a fact about his wife’s killer and writes
“Don’t believe his lies” on the back of Teddy’s polaroid. Leonard was so
determined to find his wife’s killer and avenge her death that he refused to
listen to Teddy when he was trying to tell him the truth.
All of
these neo-noirs encompass similar themes of ruined relationships, mental
disorders, and revenge. Furthermore, they also echo key noir elements such as
the femme fatale and an aura of disillusionment. Just as Chinatown started
our journey with neo-noir, the film The Last Seduction is a good way to
end the semester and wrap up neo-noir. Not only does it contain common neo-noir
motifs such as Bridget having a failed marriage with her husband like in other
neo-noir pieces of literature such as Gone Girl, but it also
incorporates revenge, Bridget wanting to kill her husband and planning his
murder, just like Leonard from Memento wanted to avenge his wife’s death
and Amy from Gone Girl wanted to teach her husband a lesson for
having an affair. Finally, Bridget’s character and personality matches Daphne
Monet’s from Devil In a Blue Dress in that they are both manipulative
and make men do whatever they want and tell them to.
Not
only would the addition of the film The Last Seduction benefit the class
because it connects to and is very similar to other neo-noir films and novels
that we have read and watched in class, but it would also be a good ending to
the semester because it also clearly has elements of classical noir, such as
the femme fatale, which in addition also ties back to the beginning of the
semester with classical noir.
This was really interesting to read! I liked how there was a main focus on femme fatales, relationships, and mental illnesses. I feel as if they are commonly overlooked elements of neo-noir films. I have to say, I've not seen The Last Seduction before and that may have contributed to my confusion, but it sounds like an interesting film! If there was some short summary of the movie that could have been incorporated, I think that would have made your case stronger. There were several examples from our syllabus that you brought up which was really cool because it emphasized your claim. Another thing, the first sentence of your intro indicated that you would be discussing the reason for noir transforming into neo-noir. I didn't really get that from the essay, but it was still a good job!!!
ReplyDeleteThis was a really interesting essay!! You brought in comparisons to so many other works of noir, which really gave you a lot of credibility here!
ReplyDeleteI think at some points, you slipped in to a sort of summary of the other works in the class. Instead of talking about The Last Seduction, it seemed like you were just giving us a plot summary of other neo-noirs. One thing that might have made this better is if you cut down on the times when you brought up those other works and explained more about the movie you're focusing on!
From the way you described The Last Seduction, it sounds really similar to The Postman Always Rings Twice. I wonder if that's something you could have brought up in here! And is Bridget the main character here? Because that's a striking difference from the other noirs if that's true, and it would've been really cool to talk about!
All in all, this was a really insightful last essay!! You clearly know the noirs of the class really well!
I think that you did a really good job summing up what was happening to noir and neo-noir as genres as they evolved. The direct quotes that you used were very good, especially for memento, and all the quotes that you were well integrated. The elements in other films were not necessarily the most obvious to point out but they served your purpose better than the ones that were obvious to point out. I think the fact that you pointed out elements in other neo-noirs that happened in Last Seduction was very interesting. However, I would like to hear more about how the film fits into the syllabus and net-noir. It sounds like the film has a lot to add to the class and it would be great to point out.
ReplyDelete